INTERACTIVE (Rate the Review)
|
Even if economics and the financial system is hazy, this documentary explains a lot. Go!
|
|
|
. |
"Inside Job"
Wouldn't it be nice if, in a case of national economic disaster, we could put our finger on the people whose ignominious greed and incredibly selfish judgments caused it? And then lock them away so that they can never loot the economy again? It may be sometime after the collapse, but this documentary by Charles Ferguson, co-written by Chad Beck and Adam Bolt, attempts to cut through the complexity of the financial system and its artificial "products" in order to get the goods on the Wall Street billionaires with such a lust for money and the arrogance to go with it that they would bring havoc on the people whose hard-earned savings they savaged like it was an unending source of risk-free acquisition.
The documentary takes us back in time to the origins of the financial blowout of 2008-09 with film and video clips to illustrate the schemes and schemers who saw a chance to make a killing when the regulations were removed by the previous administration that would have prevented the fraud, collusion and Ponzi Scheme manipulation that became standard procedure among the big banks and insurance institutions. The game of wealth acquisition never had it so good. It made the Enron debacle seem like a bad day at the bingo table.
The new derivative* that became the
instrument of manipulation was the credit default swap. In this scheme, a
financial Wall Street firm like Bear Stearns would, through their hedge
funds, acquire mortgages and company debt that were, despite AAA ratings,
basket cases of unreliability and growing illiquidity. Why? Because
involved in the acquisition was an insurance policy from someone like AIG
that guaranteed the investments. If the credit speculation proved
profitable, fine. If it went sour, no problem. It was guaranteed.
Therefore, no investment was too great since the profits were unending.
Until the source dried up and the free dollars ran out.
The term, "too good to be true" didn't occur to these smart guys?
When the first signs of trouble appeared in 2007 that the hedge funds
employed in this game began to look like they were in trouble, it didn't take
long before fear and panic rolled over Wall Street like a tsunami. The
greatest recession since the one in the thirties was on its way. Housing
finance giants Freedie Mac and Fannie Mae were seized. From them alone the
loss would reach near $400 Billion. Being underwater wasn't just a
metaphor.
After the disappearance of some $20 Trillian dollars from the financial
system, bailouts with huge sums of the people's money were issued to the
biggest banks and insurance companies that were considered by the Bush
administration to be too big to fail (no argument, probably true). Massive
chunks of Treasury money were issued as loans from the treasury's coffers in
order to forestall or avoid a total and decimating breakdown. Henry Paulson,
Bush's Treasury Secretary, who hadn't any worries about the easy money in the
loan industry before the devastation now spoke to the people
about how urgent these loans were. And, then, he wrote the checks.
We all know there's no free lunch. So why did the guys in control, like
Paulson, Fed Chairman Greenspan, a boatload of economists and Bush himself
think there was?
What Ferguson tries to do is help us understand the mechanisms that allowed
it to happen, the grand collusion between different but related interests
which enabled the swindle; senators and lobbyists who were lining their own
pockets; economics professors who were gathering fees they never had before
by supporting the false claim of safety and wisdom; the rating companies who
were capitalizing on their years of integrity by issuing far rosier ratings
than the balance sheets justified.
He similarly makes mincemeat out of the agencies that are supposed to protect
us from being duped. He virtually indicts Fed Chairman Greenspan
for sticking stubbornly to trickle-down theories against all evidence to the
contrary. Ferguson devotes much screen time to show us what the corporate
elite spend their money on: real estate properties around the globe, boats,
planes, limoes, jewelry, million dollar paintings, etc.--in a constant game
of one-upmanship with their peers.
What is especially fruitful here is Ferguson's preparation for the lies
coverups, reinterpretations and myths several of his subjects try to use
in an attempt to create a fog of confusion around their complicity,
deception, abuse, bad advice and corruption. His attack of truth made some of
them (David McCormick, former Under Secretary for International Affairs at
the U.S. Treasury, deputy NSA advisor on international economic affairs;
Frederic Mishkin, Board of Governors at the Federal Reserve, 2006-2008)
squirm, or go silent. It's enough to make you want to send the governmental
watchdogs and the sloppy rich on Wall Street to a cell near Bernie Madoff.
But Ferguson is an equal opportunity accuser. He points out that current
president Barack Obama, who should have cleared the economic advisors who
were blind to the processes of catastrophe out of government, has either
appointed many of them to his cabinet or to advisory roles. Larry Summers and
Timothy Geitner stand out. He extended Ben Bernanke's term as the Chairman
of the Fed. Once you know how these people are implicated, it's hard to
understand the rewards coming from a president who campaigned on change,
except...
Except that it shows that the pool of people who know the system well enough
to maybe give it a pill, if not a cure, is a severely limited one.
Which brings us to the inescapable realization that one might get from this
presentation: that control of our economy and the distribution of wealth is,
and for the foreseeable future will be, in New York and Washington. And, so,
a note to the teapartyers: You don't get reform by concentrating your anger
simplistically at the party in power. You're doomed to be dissatisfied
whichever party rules. But you're likely to be less victimized with the one
which realizes the vital importance of vigorous and effective regulation.
That's the only control we may ever have over those who will game us every
chance they get.
As for the emotions this subject inspires, part of mine is depression and
hopelessness in the face of a system that makes 99% of us pawns of the
privileged elite. Isn't the total lack of official investigation and justice
an indication that these operators have risen above the restraints of
justice? They sure think so. That's why their bonuses to themselves, with
government loan money, were so generous. It's their right and their due.
Isn't it?
If it proves anything it's this: You can't trust these guys!
They see no one minding the store that is the U.S. Treasury and they will go
for it with all fangs of avarice in hyper-sucking mode and to hell with those
who get a little blood on their bibs.
The documentary acknowledges the fact that a few of the liars and cheats got
hurt; and that most of them didn't go near the merest life-style
inconvenience. Maybe the household helicopter had to go. But, in any case,
it does a grand job of exploring the broad dynamics of a history-making event
with a comprehensive ear for all the experts and players who would agree to be
interviewed and to be heard. Those who wouldn't agree are clearly noted in
screen titles at relevant times, and the reasons for the reticence are made
manifestly clear by those who did appear.
Justice denied is justice lost, and the final message I took home is that we
middlers will always be in a state of manipulation by the monied class and
the corrupt lawmakers and lobbyists whose wallets they line with the fat of
the land. You can take that to the bank. |