One thing you can say about Morgan Freeman is that he can take care of
himself on anyone's literary terrain even, when it comes to the heavens
above. With total aplomb and capability, he was a preacher on the run in the
dark melodrama, "Levity", a
slightly out-of-control commanding officer in "Dreamcatcher" and, now, a very relaxed, tongue-in-cheek
comedic god. And that's just this year!
Jim Carrey, on the other hand, plays an altogether different hand, molds his
material to his patented style of exaggeration and it's pretty much the same
thing over and over. Evaluating one of his films is a matter of placing it
on his personal scale of effectiveness in bringing out the laugh and enjoying
the character. Alas, "Bruce Almighty" is not "The Truman Show." But, nor is
it "The Cable Guy."
Here, he's Bruce Nolan, field reporter for a Buffalo TV station with a great
desire to become an anchor man. When he loses out to a competitor, he goes
whacko on camera, forfeits his job, and finds himself looking for work in a
clinically spotless warehouse where a white-suited guy (Morgan Freeman) is
mopping the already polished floor. It turns out that this little meeting is
not coincidental. It's a matter of divine destiny.
For some clinically obscure reason that only a Hollywood writer would
understand, Bruce's failings have become a matter of concern and comedy for
the supreme being, which the white-suited guy is. God, in other words. And
God is aware of how thoroughly narcissistic and self-absorbed Bruce is. God
knows how selfishly Bruce treats his girlfriend Grace Connelly (an
overpowered Jennifer Anniston) while professing his love for her. What Bruce
calls love we recognize as emotional desolation. When we see the patience
with which she reacts to his exaggerated egomania, we realize we're in the
Carrey dimension of suspended disbelief.
So, the premise here is to redeem the unredeemable, giving Carrey another
shot at restoring his wavery comic standing after several boxoffice defeats
("The Majestic", "Me, Myself & Irene"). But the infantile level of his
actions strains that possibility and puts to rest any hope of achieving
sympathy for the notion of celestial interference as an avenue to
self-improvement. An "It's a Wonderful Life" of 1946 -- which it seems to
have as a model -- it's not. Yes, there are a few unavoidable yocks in his
routine, appealing mostly to the juvenile funnybone. But, the message these
filmmakers (director Tom Shadyac, writers Steve Koren and Mark O'Keefe) seem
to have been headed for -- humility through wish fulfillment -- is too mocked
up with a supposed sympathy for the character than that which we discover on
screen.

~~ Jules Brenner